Showing posts with label estate agent fees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label estate agent fees. Show all posts

Thursday 28 February 2019

Estate Agents: Unlawful restriction on freedom of choice of conveyancer


Add caption
Times are hard for a number of estate agents, and with a sharp fall in commission, a number of agents are focusing more on increasing their secondary revenue streams, particularly referral fees.


We all know that referral arrangements exist and are, at least for now, a fact of life. The question whether agents and linked conveyances are as open about these arrangements as they should, is less clear.



The pressure on agents to maximise secondary income has led to an increasing number of complaints about the unprofessional and unlawful tactic of ‘bad mouthing’ the vendor’s choice of conveyancer in an effort to ‘sell’ the service of their own pet conveyancer.

We have found ourselves the victim of this practice.   Three local agents have made unjust remarks about our service in an effort to deter prospective clients from engaging us.   We have written to each and have not had the courtesy of a response.

This conduct is abhorrent and is on the rise.   The objective is clear.  The agent is keen not to lose the commission that will be gained if the agent can steer the client to the agent’s pet conveyancer.  No regard is had to the wishes of the client or indeed the client’s rights. 

A truly independent conveyancer will undertake due diligence on the legal title without influence from the agent,  and may, for instance, advise the client not to proceed with the purchase if there is a major issue with the title.   The conveyancer may also assist the client to purchase the property at the current market price and not at the value advised by the agent.   In short the conveyancer will act independently to everyone apart form the client. 

The risk for the client who is pushed in the direction of the preferred conveyancer is that the service provided may be strongly influenced by the value to the conveyancer of the high volume of work it receives from that agent.    There will be pressure on the linked conveyancer not to upset the agent who is feeding it with regular work.   The conveyancer would be less likely to advise on issues that could delay or jeopardise the transaction. 

So what is the narrative these agents use to ensure a prospective client goes with their recommendation?

Firstly, its best to use “our conveyancer is local" - There is no great advantage in a conveyancing solicitor being local because nearly all conveyancing tasks are completed using email and telephone.  Just because the conveyancer is local does not mean the conveyancer is any good!

“We use them all the time" - by the very nature of the arrangement, which will not be disclosed,  this is true. However the agent will have no direct control over the pace of the transaction, nor the actions of the other conveyancers in the chain. 

"Our conveyancer  is quick" -  There is no conveyancer who can guarantee a quick service due to the fact that the transaction will only proceed as fast as the slowest party in the chain.   Conveyancers have little control over the delivery time of searches and mortgage offers, for instance. 


‘If you go with your choice of conveyancer you will have problems’  - if a client hears this he or she should run a mile. Though the agent may profess to know about very conveyancer under the sun, the reality is that the agent will have little genuine information on the conveyancer and will not be basing the opinion on any facts.   The very fact the agent has mentioned this should ring alarm bells straight away.  The best advice is to walk out of the agency and look to find an honest agent, or to go the choice of conveyancer direct who  we are sure will point you in the right direction. 

It is both morally and legally wrong to provide false information in the delivery of a service. 

The National Trading Standards' Estate Agency Team issued guidance on property sales in September 2015 which clearly sets out the duties which estate agents, must provide to consumers, what rights consumers and clients have and what redress they have.

The guidelines are far-reaching and legally enforceable and breaches can be prosecuted in the criminal courts, resulting in possible jail terms and unlimited fines.

In particular, unfairness in practice, as defined in the guidance, is defined as results arising from the following:

  • Giving false or misleading information to consumers regardless of how delivered, whether verballyin writing or via telephone. This would cover providing a client with misleading information about the clients preferred conveyancer.
  • Exerting undue pressure on consumers including pressuring a potential buyer to use associated services for example to use a particular firm of conveyancers
  • Not acting with the standard of care and skill that is in accordance with honest market practice and in good faith.


Furthermore it  is illegal under the Estate Agents Act 1979 for an Agent to force a client to use the Agent’s preferred conveyancer. 

Blame for this practice does not stop with the agent and a client faced with pressure should also report the Agent’s pet conveyancer. 

Both the Solicitor's Regulation Authority (SRA) and the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) make it very clear that its members are meant to ensure that their client has chosen them to act without pressure being exerted on them to do so.

If  a client considers  he or she has been caught up in one of these referral arrangements and have been deprived of a free choice of conveyancer our advice is to complain to the Agent and also to the Regulator of the pet conveyancer. 

We will be happy to provide you with advice on you options. 

And finally….  Do keep in mind that it will probably cost the client  more - ( between £100 and £200) by engaging the pet conveyancer because most of these arrangements work on the basis of the referring agent’s referral fee being added to the fee paid for the conveyancing transaction. 

MJP Conveyancing are solicitors who provide legal advice and services to clients based in England and Wales and who can be contacted on 01603877067 or via email at davidp@mjpconveyancing.com

Saturday 31 May 2014

Demand more for the fee you pay to your estate agent

I always make a big effort to manage my clients expectations when  taking on new instructions. I do this because some clients may be buying a home for the first time and other clients arrive on our door step with  a distorted expectation stemming from discussions with the estate agent.  I am not sure why some agents believe that conveyancers  have attended Hogwarts.  I am certain however that by providing a client with misinformation about the conveyancing process some agents simply do not do their clients any favours. 

You pay your estate agent a small fortune to market your property and perhaps the time has come for us all to expect the agent to do more than put a ‘For Sale’ board up and place a few advertisements in the local newspaper.  A simplistic view I know and I must qualify the preceding and following observations by acknowledging that not all agents are the same.  There do exist pro active agents who often prove very helpful. 

So what could the agent be doing to help to speed up the process of a house sale?

To begin with it would be good to know that your agent has some knowledge of the legal process behind selling and buying a home.  How many agents have actually taken the time out to spend time with a conveyancer to understand the steps involved and more importantly the reasons why delays can arise.   If an agent devoted the same amount of time to learning about conveyancing as some agents  do in chasing a conveyancer for updates there would be vast reduction in the the number of interruptions conveyancers receive each day and a massive improvement in turnaround times. 

I did send an email around not too long ago inviting agents to a free training session.  The idea was to provide an overview of the selling and buying process.  Surprise, surprise I did not receive one acknowledgement let alone an acceptance! 

If you sell a home there are what are known as transaction forms to complete.  These set out details on the property such as council tax banding and particulars of the items you are leaving in the home.  These are forms which normally take a client sometime to compete and there are some clients who need help in completing the forms.  I have never understood why the selling agent does not hold a stock of these forms so hand to clients when it comes to the marketing of the property.  It would save so much time and allow the conveyancer to send out the contract pack much quicker. 

Helping the client to get  together to pass to the conveyancer the warranties, guarantees and planning and building documents would also make life so much easier for the conveyancer.  We spend so much time on chasing clients for forms and documents and this is often the source of major delays. 

Once the transaction is up and running the agent should not telephone/email the conveyancer every day seeking an update.  Rather than helping these constant interruptions only serve to cause delay.  We have ploughed several thousands of pounds into developing a state of arts online tracking systems which clients love and which is accessed by our clients around 13,000 times each month.  The system also allows the selling agent on sales to receive the same updates but to actually get an an agent to use it is simply impossible.  The mentality is why should I access an online system when I can try and get the information by telephoning.  Agents seem obsessed by the telephone.  

Last month our support team took over 4000 call of which 70% were from agents.  These calls involved over 150 hours of manpower which we could have used far more usefully in progressing transactions. 

The other way agents could help and is to give up on creating a blame culture.  Some agents enjoy playing one party to a transaction against the other.  Why?   All it does is to fuel unnecessary stress and make the whole process even more painful. 

The agent could play a far bigger role in helping the conveyancer when it comes to fixing a completion date.   This can often prove to be a logistical nightmare and trying to get the agent to call the other agents involved to come up with a mutually acceptable completion date would help to save so much time and wasted energy. 

I suppose what I am trying to say is that if there was a closer working relationship between the agent and the conveyancer, and a better understanding of the selling and buying process on the part of the agent,  the time it takes to sell a property could be much shorter and less stressful.  Is this likely to happen in the future?  I very much doubt it.  Agents are not going to change when there is no need to do so given the very high fees they charge. Why do more work than is necessary?

Perhaps some conveyancers who pay agents for referring home sellers to them are partly to blame.  Would they really wish to do anything that could rock the boat?

Morgan Jones and Pett are solicitors who provide legal advice and services to clients based in England and Wales and who can be contacted on 01603877000 or via email at davidpett@m-j-p.co.uk

Thursday 4 October 2012

Can the fee of an estate agent be justified?


It often makes me choke when I learn how much the estate agent is to be paid in commission on the sale of a property.   Often fifteen times more than my fee and for much less effort.   On top of this the agent may also be receiving a referral fee of around £200 to £300 from the solicitor he or she has recommended. Yes, you could accuse me of jealously, and yes, perhaps I should seriously think of a career change. 

It is also I suppose a sad indictment of my profession when one looks at how the Law Society has allowed such a situation to arise.   Solicitors were at one time paid according to a national fee scale, so depending how much a property was worth their fee would be calculated accordingly.   Unfortunately an inept professional body combined with outside competition has led to many solicitors undertaking property transactions for less that the cost of a family ticket to gain entry to Alton Towers.

So how can an estate agent justify such a large fee?  It is true that the cost of advertising and employing staff is high.  It is equally fair to concede that difficult to sell property can often create a long running financial burden for the agent.  However there can be no justification for an agent calculating a fee based on a percentage of the value of the property.  This is outdated and has no relationship with effort or ‘value for money’ considerations.

I would perhaps be less harsh in my view if I could be convinced that most agents deliver a high and efficient service for the home seller and buyer.   My experience suggests the opposite.    There are a large number of agents who consider their role is nothing other than to advertise property, to introduce a potential buyer to a seller, and to then look to the solicitor acting for the seller to collect their fee at the end of the transaction for immediate banking.    These agents are not keen to assist during the sale transaction and spend most of their time playing one solicitor off against another.

I am sorry but I expect an agent to be more pro-active and to do everything possible to assist the seller and the selling solicitor in making sure the seller’s experience in selling their home is pleasant and stress free.

There are a number of administrative tasks during a transaction that an agent could undertake. They could help with the delivery and signing of documents such as the contract and transfer.  They could play a larger role in collecting replies to inquiries and also helping to coordinate exchange and completion dates.   On the whole there are plenty of ways the agent could in collaboration with your solicitor help to speed up the process and to put it bluntly do more to justify the high fee charged.

At present our experience is that many agents actually contribute to delay through constantly calling the office for pointless updates as well as giving home sellers unrealistic expectations about how long the process will take to complete.

I did have an attempt to stand up to local agents.   About six months ago I said I would only collect the agent’s fee from the client and meet the extra work and cost of passing this money onto the agent if the agent paid me £50.     I did add that if the agent referred a couple of clients to me each month I would waive the fee.  What reaction did I receive?   Well it was if World War 3 had broken out.  ‘What right do you have to demand payment?’  ‘You are not allowed to do that!’ ‘We will report you”.    It was as if I had committed a crime.    The agents just did not get it.  For a fee of around 1% of their fee (or some referrals) I was offering to continue to collect their fee from the client (even no there is no obligation on me to do so) to preserve their cash flow and to minimize their bad debt.    They could not see that given how my fee structure had been squeezed the extra cost to me of collecting and accounting to them was beginning to impact on my bottom line.

All but one agent refused to pay and I now tell clients that they must pay the agent direct.  It’s a shame more solicitors do not recognize that this custom of collecting and paying the agent’s fee is no longer financially sustainable.  In a climate where the likes of Ryan Air  are looking to cover the cost of any extra administrative task however small  surely its time to break away from outdated and unnecessary conventions?

At the end of each transaction we send out a client feedback questionnaire and on this we ask the client to give a rating on their agent.   We always send the completed form to the agent and invite comment.  Not one agent has come back to us.  It seems the majority of agents just do not care.

Will anything change?  This is unlikely to happen as long as homeowners continue to pay scale related commission.    As long as the agent continues to receive such high fees why would the agent wish to change anything?  

Featured post

If it's not broken don't fix it